Liz Lucy Robillard

 A 2024 case report describes a ten-month-old female who developed viremia, meningoencephalitis, and multi-organ failure after receiving the live-attenuated measles vaccine.  Whole-genome sequencing revealed a homozygous loss-of-function mutation in IFNAR2, abolishing type-I interferon signaling and leaving the child vulnerable to severe viral disease.  The authors note that defects in IFNAR2 define immunodeficiency-45 and that carriers of such mutations are at high risk for life-threatening complications from either natural measles infection or the live vaccine itself . Poland and co-workers have repeatedly shown that common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the measles virus receptors CD46 and SLAM, as well as in TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, RIG-I, and multiple HLA class I and II loci, significantly modulate cytokine release, antibody production, and cellular immunity after measles exposure or vaccination. Individuals carrying the “low-response” alleles mount weaker antiviral res...

 Lenny Henry’s Betrayal of Britain By Liz Lucy Robillard The Man Who Once United Us Sir Lenny Henry was once the face of Britain’s better self — talent over privilege, laughter over division. A boy from Dudley who broke barriers through wit, timing, and graft. He represented the proof that this country, for all its flaws, still rewarded merit. Millions saw themselves in his rise: the Britain where race mattered less than effort. Now, after a lifetime of success, he is calling for reparations from the nation that gave him everything. That is not courage; it is betrayal disguised as conscience. Britain’s Record Deserves Respect Britain did not invent slavery, but it did lead the world in abolishing it. Parliament outlawed the trade in 1807, and the Empire abolished slavery itself in 1833. British ships hunted slavers for decades at enormous cost. Tens of thousands of sailors fought and died intercepting slave vessels. Our ancestors paid in blood and treasure to end a global evil. No ...

REFORM and Deportation- The costs Liz Lucy Robillard The Real Legal Limits of the “Restore Britain” Deportation Plan A new paper by Restore Britain calls for mass deportations of everyone living in the UK without legal status. It sounds decisive and patriotic, but the plan breaks far more laws than it fixes — and would very likely collapse in the courts before the first charter flight took off. This post unpacks what’s lawful, what isn’t, and who would actually make or lose money if any of it went ahead. 1. What They Want The Restore Britain report demands: Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR); Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998; Repealing the Equality Act 2010; Introducing a “Great Clarification Act” letting Parliament override judges; And deporting up to two million people within three years. 2. What the Law Actually Allows Most of those measures are unlawful under existing UK and international law. Here’s why. A. Rule of Law and Separation of Powers Courts, not mi...

Global SecureDrop & Whistleblower Submission Links Use Tor or follow each outlet’s own guidance for full anonymity. United States New York Times Washington Post Associated Press ProPublica WIRED CNN Bloomberg News USA TODAY Network United Kingdom The Guardian BBC News Financial Times Ireland RTÉ Investigates France Mediapart Le Monde – Source sûre Germany Der Spiegel Süddeutsche Zeitung Australia ABC News Global Resources SecureDrop Directory – official list Freedom of the Press Foundation guide More soon

London was on fire today—not with bombs or bullets, but with voices. Ordinary people, the kind who pay their bills, raise their kids, and love this country with a stubborn loyalty, finally had enough. The British have always been suckers for fair play. It’s in the blood. Generous, tolerant, forgiving—we’ve never needed lectures about kindness. We’ve lived it. We welcomed strangers, helped them, called them friends. And now? Laws twisted, speech gagged, citizens treated like criminals for waving the flag that built this island. Hypocrisy never looked so cheap. Extremists slipped in the back door while the politicians cashed their checks. Creeps with smiles and fake compassion sold out the soul of the country. The ordinary man in the street? He wasn’t to blame for the wars. Hell, we fought them to stop bullies and save people who couldn’t save themselves. But try telling that to the keyboard fascists screaming online.  They sound more like Nazis than the Nazis ever did. This isn’t a ...

 Don't Blame the British Public for Old Colonial Horrors- why it's a mistake. Responsibility lies at the top - not with regular people. The empire was about big business. Pure and simple. It created huge wealth and now the collective hangover guilt- especially among our more compassionate voters- is clearly messing up - people being arrested for 'thought crime' is apparently actually happening in the UK (and affecting not the terminally rich and spoiled) Thought Crime Arrests It is a tragic and dangerous habit of human beings to mistake the sins of power for the sins of the people. And some injured parties want to see the destruction of the UK as is evident here- Britain Being Destroyed From Within When nations inherit the bittero memory of empire, the fury is often directed at those least able to bear it: the ordinary citizens, the neighbour, the single mum, the shopkeeper, the labourer, the soldier who fought and bled without ever once sitting in a cabinet room or sig...

  Psychiatry, sweetie, is the ultimate high-society hustle. A bit of a scam at times- really.   In Allen Frances’s book 'Saving Normal', the old (incredible) insider plays both sides.  One moment he’s confessing that the DSM turned everyday quirks into gold-plated diagnoses. Then he’s condemning the system even more and telling us he's responsible for the autism surge.  The truth? Diagnoses are invented in backrooms, voted into existence like casting calls at a Beverly Hills mansion.  No blood tests, no scans, no hard evidence – just a committee deciding whether your heartbreak, your wild night, your traumatic abuse and it's injustices or your kid’s fidgeting- deserves a label not a resolution.   And every new label is another shot of champagne for Big Pharma- that let's face it- hasn't updated it's ethical framework in a while? The drugs? Love- they don’t heal- they ,*mask* they sedate, they numb, they toy with your body chemistry like a bad boy ...

 The so-called autism epidemic has been sold to the public as an unprecedented surge in children afflicted with a mysterious condition. In reality, it is an epidemic created by psychiatry itself. The numbers rose not because millions of children suddenly lost the ability to function in society, but because diagnostic boundaries were quietly expanded. Dr Allen Frances, the psychiatrist who chaired the DSM-IV task force, has been unusually candid. He later said his “biggest DSM-IV regret” was that “our broadening the autism definition … led to such massive, careless over-diagnosis” (Allen Frances, Twitter, April 2023). In another interview he admitted he was “very sorry for helping to lower the diagnosis bar” (New York Post, April 24 2023). When the architect of the system admits diagnostic inflation—not hidden disease—is to blame, the foundations of the narrative begin to collapse. Families have been trapped in this narrative for decades. They were not villains. They were misled. A ...

Are Very Dozy Sheep in Charge of Charities? Do charities care more for their mortgages than you? Let's look at evidence of some that are meant to assist disabled kids. Disabled kids are not being catered to properly and people -sometimes -tend to get wealthy on their pain and vulnerability- sadly there are no doubts at all about that.  Communication devices to non speakers: I had a fey-kind but watery- response from the government regarding this-an attempt to shut me up (lol) - absolute evidence I am correct about all this... Proof that professionals get it wrong across the board- kids are unique -but the stupid, very, very, painfully, lazy training - hasn't allowed for this absolute science.  The funds go to pay all the bloody professions and NOT to the disabled kids themselves!!! It is RAMPANT exploitation by people with nice homes thank you- who purport to live and breathe for good causes- as long as they get all the mod cons and 4 holidays a year in Corsica and staff to d...

NHS negligence 58 Billion - National Defence budget is for the 2025/26  is planned at around £59.8 billion. Tories were in charge. Labour footing the bill. Not one tory paper has covered this- doesn't say much for their *integrity*  Let that sink in. ..... The NHS can be a helpful, good service, especially in emergencies and for people on exceptionally low incomes, and it is run by kind-hearted, usually very well-meaning staff. 'Do-gooders' have their place as do interfering busy-bodies! Yet sometimes, healthcare in the UK becomes excessive, overreaching, and unnecessarily intrusive – which can be bloody dangerous. Opt-outs from data sharing, it seems, are not preventing fragmented records from circulating across departments, public services, and authorities. This risks erroneous data being passed around, which can cause huge harm, possibly life-changing or life-threatening outcomes as a result. Digital records may offer a great fix, but change takes time. Busy GPs...

 28 Aug 2025, 23:59 BST  Removed and banned from the Medium platform. How sweet. A note to trolls. 'There is a disturbing habit among some pro vaccine advocates. Not science, but sneering. They mock those who say they were injured, they dismiss their pain, and they call it protecting the public. It is not protecting the public. It is cruelty. Medicine has never been risk free. Global safety data from the last ten years shows that around one in ten patients are harmed during healthcare and that much of this harm is preventable. This is what the World Health Organization itself has reported. Vaccines are part of the same system. They help many, but they are not free of risk. Regulators, compensation programs, and courts have documented harm. Here are more than ten examples of legally documented iatrogenic harm in the last decade. 1. In Utah a judge awarded nearly one billion dollars to a family after a baby suffered severe brain damage from a botched delivery at Jordan Valley Me...

 25 Aug 2025 Article 10: Free Expression as Europe’s Anchor When religion and free speech collide, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights is the reference point every authority must understand. It is not just a legal clause—it is the backbone of democratic culture. What Article 10 Says 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This includes freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority. 2. Restrictions are allowed only when “necessary in a democratic society” for reasons such as national security, prevention of crime, or protection of the rights of others. Those protections and attitudes must be considered in multiple ways from different perspectives. The Core Principle The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly stressed: free expression includes the right to offend, shock, or disturb. Democracies do not protect citizens from discomfort; they protect citizens’ right to speak. Key Rul...

'Conviction unsafe' says the expert program, again. This is hotly debated online, and I agree the number of searches sounds quite odd- so as per- I consulted a professional judges legal gpt - the prosecution argument obviously doesn't need more coverage and is left to the professionals involved - and so it should be - meantime- " CCRC submission combining the unsafe conviction argument and comparative evidence. ccrc submission – record search evidence introduction this submission concerns the reliance at trial on evidence that Lucy Letby accessed records of approximately 200 families of deceased infants under her care.  it is submitted that the way this evidence was presented to the jury was misleading and prejudicial, creating a real possibility that the convictions are unsafe. issue whether the record search evidence was wrongly or unfairly used to suggest criminal intent, and whether its presentation without proper comparative context deprived the jury of a fair and...

 14 August 2025 Why Private, Random Thoughts Should Never Be Used to Convict Someone The human mind produces thousands of thoughts a day — neuroscientists estimate anywhere between 6,000 and 60,000, most of which are fleeting, contradictory, and involuntary. Many are never acted upon, and many are not even consciously endorsed. Yet in some criminal cases, prosecutors have presented diary entries, private journal notes, or scraps of written thought as “proof” of intent or guilt. This practice is scientifically flawed, psychologically dangerous, and legally unsound. 1. Thoughts Are Not Actions From a neuroscience perspective, there is a clear distinction between thought generation and behavioural execution. Thoughts arise in networks such as the default mode network (DMN), which is active during mind-wandering. These spontaneous mental events are often exploratory or emotional “drafts” — not plans. Turning a thought into action requires activation of goal-directed executive circuits ...