Dear Family Court Judge
To the Judge in Family Courts: A Brief Note Edited by chatgpt Keywords: collusion, misfeasance, perjury, ad hominem, article 6, Mediation Collusion between social workers and legal teams is not only unjust and far from probity—it undermines the foundational principles of the justice system. When such coordination leads to misleading or false statements being presented in court, it effectively constitutes perjury (as defined under the Perjury Act 1911, Section 1). Allowing parties freedom to present their case in their own way, could help. Solicitors creating statements for their clients as verbatim when they are not, ought to be reviewed. When falsehoods are knowingly permitted or unchallenged by the court, and decisions are made on that basis, it amounts to misfeasance in public office—a recognized tort under common law. This is a serious breach of duty that carries legal consequences. Rubber-stamping such conduct compromises the integrity of the court and violates th...