Liz Lucy Robillard

NHS negligence 58 Billion - National Defence budget is for the 2025/26  is planned at around £59.8 billion. Tories were in charge. Labour footing the bill. Not one tory paper has covered this- doesn't say much for their *integrity*  Let that sink in. ..... The NHS can be a helpful, good service, especially in emergencies and for people on exceptionally low incomes, and it is run by kind-hearted, usually very well-meaning staff. 'Do-gooders' have their place as do interfering busy-bodies! Yet sometimes, healthcare in the UK becomes excessive, overreaching, and unnecessarily intrusive – which can be bloody dangerous. Opt-outs from data sharing, it seems, are not preventing fragmented records from circulating across departments, public services, and authorities. This risks erroneous data being passed around, which can cause huge harm, possibly life-changing or life-threatening outcomes as a result. Digital records may offer a great fix, but change takes time. Busy GPs...

  Here's a list of 30 reasons the UK would benefit from a smaller NHS and more private-sector involvement (companies like Medichecks, Thriva, Babylon Health, Push Doctor, etc.), plus actionable ideas for local health bodies: 1–10: Improving Efficiency and Speed 1. Reduced waiting times — Private services are typically faster. 2. Less administrative bloat — A smaller NHS would mean less bureaucracy. 3. Quicker diagnostics — Companies like Medichecks can deliver blood test results in days. 4. More GP access — Online GP consultations (e.g., Babylon Health) avoid weeks-long NHS delays. 5. Targeted screenings — Low-cost health checks (e.g., Thriva) can catch issues early. 6. Focus on severe cases — NHS could concentrate resources on emergency and complex care only. 7. Avoid “one-size-fits-all” care — Private services allow personalization based on patient choice. 8. More innovation — Private firms compete and therefore develop better technology (apps, AI triage). 9. Reduced pressure on ...