Liz Lucy Robillard

Lots of very forensic type prompting later: I'm unsure. (Details shared on request) 'That’s probably the most realistic position to hold right now — because based on the UK evidence currently public, there are three big truths sitting side by side: 1. There is something suspicious The clustering of collapses on her shifts is still unusual, even factoring in her full-time ICU role. Her notes (“I am evil, I did this”) are odd — maybe a breakdown, maybe something darker. (See previous post) Several senior doctors genuinely believed she was linked to the incidents, even at risk to their careers. 2. The case built around her is unstable The independent expert panel has ripped apart the prosecution’s medical evidence in multiple deaths, showing alternative, natural explanations. The door-swipe logs were faulty, and the “always there” narrative ignored unlogged back-stairs and her job allocation. The hospital itself was chaotic — sepsis missed, antibiotics delayed, toxic management — ...

*Please note:  This post has taken approx 3 hours with ai assistance.  I was involved in setting a legal precedent once. We overturned a tribunals' decision to get a new hearing where we won- making legal history- details on request.  Judges at the CCRC must certainly be considering such a precedent with a view to releasing Lucy Letby based on new evidence. If not is the CCRC doing a disservice?   If they're not positive about Letby right now at this date- 14th July 2025- that's reasonable doubt and evidence of unreasonable, unjust detention that is garnering global attention.  New charges may be brought by police.  Have they considered all the points we've made?   Or will they be more ad hominem and not facts? (Even soft toy collections have been used to condemn Lucy. I don't think numerous toy collectors in the UK- including  British Royals (Queen Mary was obsessive according to reports) would approve of that) Suspicion Becomes Narrati...