Lucy Letby- further digging on the LLM

Lots of very forensic type prompting later:

I'm unsure. (Details shared on request)

'That’s probably the most realistic position to hold right now — because based on the UK evidence currently public, there are three big truths sitting side by side:

1. There is something suspicious

The clustering of collapses on her shifts is still unusual, even factoring in her full-time ICU role.

Her notes (“I am evil, I did this”) are odd — maybe a breakdown, maybe something darker. (See previous post)

Several senior doctors genuinely believed she was linked to the incidents, even at risk to their careers.

2. The case built around her is unstable

The independent expert panel has ripped apart the prosecution’s medical evidence in multiple deaths, showing alternative, natural explanations.

The door-swipe logs were faulty, and the “always there” narrative ignored unlogged back-stairs and her job allocation.

The hospital itself was chaotic — sepsis missed, antibiotics delayed, toxic management — making a natural spike in deaths plausible.

3. Both extremes (total guilt vs. total innocence) feel unlikely

There’s still enough odd (her notes, clustering, doctors’ suspicions) to make outright innocence hard to accept.

But the scale of the original convictions — and the way evidence was presented — feels too shaky to hold without major review.

So what does that mean?

Most probable path:

The Thirlwall Inquiry will validate the panel’s doubts, criticise the hospital, and create pressure for the CCRC to refer multiple convictions back to appeal.

By 2026, she could face reduced convictions, partial retrials, or a different sentence — but probably not a full exoneration.

The public story will shift to “Letby may have done something, but the hospital and Crown built a deeply flawed case.”


Updates eventually. *It does seem to me that the authorities have enough information to hurry up though, the need for clarification in retrials has to be the only way to establish what really happened - and to get a possibly innocent person out of jail. The big thing for me is *she had no history of cruelty* 

Liz Lucy Robillard


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lucy Letby and the 200 Facebook Searches

'Conviction unsafe' says the expert program, again. This is hotly debated online, and I agree the number of searches sounds quite odd- so as per- I consulted a professional judges legal gpt - the prosecution argument obviously doesn't need more coverage and is left to the professionals involved - and so it should be - meantime- " CCRC submission combining the unsafe conviction argument and comparative evidence. ccrc submission – record search evidence introduction this submission concerns the reliance at trial on evidence that Lucy Letby accessed records of approximately 200 families of deceased infants under her care.  it is submitted that the way this evidence was presented to the jury was misleading and prejudicial, creating a real possibility that the convictions are unsafe. issue whether the record search evidence was wrongly or unfairly used to suggest criminal intent, and whether its presentation without proper comparative context deprived the jury of a fair and...
Read more

Lucy Letby - The Notes, Where The Law Failed

 14 August 2025 Why Private, Random Thoughts Should Never Be Used to Convict Someone The human mind produces thousands of thoughts a day — neuroscientists estimate anywhere between 6,000 and 60,000, most of which are fleeting, contradictory, and involuntary. Many are never acted upon, and many are not even consciously endorsed. Yet in some criminal cases, prosecutors have presented diary entries, private journal notes, or scraps of written thought as “proof” of intent or guilt. This practice is scientifically flawed, psychologically dangerous, and legally unsound. 1. Thoughts Are Not Actions From a neuroscience perspective, there is a clear distinction between thought generation and behavioural execution. Thoughts arise in networks such as the default mode network (DMN), which is active during mind-wandering. These spontaneous mental events are often exploratory or emotional “drafts” — not plans. Turning a thought into action requires activation of goal-directed executive circuits ...
Read more

The Witchhunt

From my upcoming memoir: 'My son suffers from severe autism or possibly Angelman syndrome (which wasn't definitively excluded when he underwent genetic testing). As a concerned parent, I reached out to several specialists in the field of autism, desperate to know how best to support him. In 1994, when my son was two, I started an information service called Autistic Information Matters to seek answers, provide support, and share facts. After much difficulty with professionals—including a Professor Ben Sacks who cruelly suggested I send my two-year-old to an institution (I told him to get out)—I discovered Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA). At the time, I believed it might be a miracle cure that could help my son begin speaking. However, after extensive research and insights from other parents, I came to realize that autism is an umbrella term, encompassing a variety of conditions rather than a single disorder. (I have written more about this elsewhere.) During this time, I wa...
Read more