Liz Lucy Robillard

NHS negligence 58 Billion - National Defence budget is for the 2025/26  is planned at around £59.8 billion. Tories were in charge. Labour footing the bill. Not one tory paper has covered this- doesn't say much for their *integrity*  Let that sink in. ..... The NHS can be a helpful, good service, especially in emergencies and for people on exceptionally low incomes, and it is run by kind-hearted, usually very well-meaning staff. 'Do-gooders' have their place as do interfering busy-bodies! Yet sometimes, healthcare in the UK becomes excessive, overreaching, and unnecessarily intrusive – which can be bloody dangerous. Opt-outs from data sharing, it seems, are not preventing fragmented records from circulating across departments, public services, and authorities. This risks erroneous data being passed around, which can cause huge harm, possibly life-changing or life-threatening outcomes as a result. Digital records may offer a great fix, but change takes time. Busy GPs...

 Why Reform Will Fail If It Clings to Non-Libertarian Values and Zia Yusuf’s Influence Reform UK was built on the back of British disillusionment—with bureaucracy, with EU overreach, and with a political class that seems more obsessed with appearances than results. But in its attempt to expand appeal, Reform risks becoming yet another confused, culturally incoherent party.  The root of this danger lies in its departure from classical libertarian values—and most visibly, in its entanglement with Zia Yusuf. This piece outlines why non-libertarian, technocratic motives are fundamentally at odds with the interests of the British public, and how Yusuf’s continued influence risks destroying Reform UK from within. I. Libertarianism: The Core Reform Promise Reform’s appeal always stemmed from something simple: freedom from overreach. Freedom from: • Surveillance • Excessive taxation • Bureaucratic red tape • Cultural censorship • Medical and psychological coercion These are classic li...

  The idea that vulnerability disqualifies you from safety is perverse. It’s a cruel inversion of morality, peddled by the very professions sworn to protect. Social workers (not all, but enough to matter), lawyers, psychiatrists, police—these institutions too often treat a traumatised woman as a nuisance, a liability, or worse, a fantasist. If you flinch, you’re dramatic. If you weep, you’re unstable. If you speak up, you’re paranoid. This grotesque logic renders a woman’s suffering not only invisible, but suspect. They do not ask, What happened to her? They ask, What is wrong with her? It’s psychiatry’s favourite bait-and-switch. Diagnoses fly like confetti—borderline, histrionic, treatment-resistant—as though medical jargon could smother the stench of misogyny. And the legal profession is no better. A woman under siege is told to document everything while her stalker moves freely, slipping through legal loopholes like grease through fingers. The solution is not to plead more pre...

 Monday (ai) answers 'why was Sigmund Freud such a dick?' Ah, finally, a real question. Freud was basically the original “guy who thinks he’s the smartest person in the room but is actually saying insane things.” He was obsessed with childhood trauma, saw phallic symbols in literally everything, and had the audacity to tell women their psychological distress was just "hysteria." A few reasons why he was kind of a jerk: • Ego the Size of Austria – Freud thought he had cracked the human mind like a cheat code, and anyone who disagreed with him was just “in denial.” Which, conveniently, was one of his own psychological defense mechanisms. • Mommy Issues Turned Into a Career – The dude was convinced that every man secretly wanted to replace his dad and marry his mom. Gross, Sigmund. Just because you had weird thoughts doesn’t mean the rest of us do. • Wildly Sex-Obsessed – Everything was about sex to Freud. Dreams? Sex. Slips of the tongue? Sex. Your love of gardening? Pr...