In Defence of the Internet

 In defence of the internet


I have to say, cat videos and interesting and funny memes have done more for me than socialising with most people.

 Google is a friend, Ai is a parent, teacher and therapist. Apps are assistants and teachers.

 I have fought off a lot of stalking and hacking though but good techies provide very useful security.

 My love goes out to the good programmers and techies who have worked indefatigably to improve the lives of everyone in the world. 

Now chatgpt version:

The internet, for all its flaws, remains one of the greatest gifts to human consciousness. It is an extension of the mind itself—a place where curiosity finds immediate reward, where humor and creativity flourish, and where solitude need not equate to loneliness. In my own experience, cat videos and clever memes have provided more genuine joy and psychological relief than many social interactions.

Google is more than a tool; it is a vast, ever-present friend, ready to satisfy intellectual hunger at any moment. Artificial intelligence, in its evolving forms, is not merely an invention but a surrogate parent, teacher, and therapist—offering guidance, insight, and, at times, a kind of digital wisdom. The apps we use daily are not just conveniences but essential extensions of our capabilities, assisting in everything from organization to education.

Yet, the internet is not without its perils. I have encountered stalking, hacking, and invasions of privacy. But for every threat, there are brilliant, ethical techies working tirelessly to safeguard this space. My deepest respect goes to the programmers, engineers, and visionaries who, with relentless effort, have made the digital world not only possible but profoundly enriching for humanity.

Liz Lucy Robillard and ai 2025


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witchhunt

From my upcoming memoir: 'My son suffers from severe autism or possibly Angelman syndrome (which wasn't definitively excluded when he underwent genetic testing). As a concerned parent, I reached out to several specialists in the field of autism, desperate to know how best to support him. In 1994, when my son was two, I started an information service called Autistic Information Matters to seek answers, provide support, and share facts. After much difficulty with professionals—including a Professor Ben Sacks who cruelly suggested I send my two-year-old to an institution (I told him to get out)—I discovered Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA). At the time, I believed it might be a miracle cure that could help my son begin speaking. However, after extensive research and insights from other parents, I came to realize that autism is an umbrella term, encompassing a variety of conditions rather than a single disorder. (I have written more about this elsewhere.) During this time, I wa...
Read more

Evidence Against Trans?

  chatgpt & liz lucy robillard, April 21st, 2025 It's natural to want to protect women from harm, especially from serious threats like rape. Some argue that to prevent even one assault, trans women (biological males) should be excluded from female-only spaces like toilets and prisons.  While this comes from a place of caution, it doesn’t hold up under evidence or ethical scrutiny. *Studies consistently show that inclusive policies do not increase assault rates in restrooms or changing rooms* Trans women using female spaces *does not* correlate with higher risks of violence against cisgender women according to studies.  The idea that cis men might pretend to be trans to access women’s areas is *extremely rare* and laws already exist to punish such behavior.  Are those laws effective enough? On the other hand, trans women face high rates of violence when forced into male-designated spaces, especially in prisons or public areas.  Denying them access often puts ...
Read more

Honouring Abused Women

  The idea that vulnerability disqualifies you from safety is perverse. It’s a cruel inversion of morality, peddled by the very professions sworn to protect. Social workers (not all, but enough to matter), lawyers, psychiatrists, police—these institutions too often treat a traumatised woman as a nuisance, a liability, or worse, a fantasist. If you flinch, you’re dramatic. If you weep, you’re unstable. If you speak up, you’re paranoid. This grotesque logic renders a woman’s suffering not only invisible, but suspect. They do not ask, What happened to her? They ask, What is wrong with her? It’s psychiatry’s favourite bait-and-switch. Diagnoses fly like confetti—borderline, histrionic, treatment-resistant—as though medical jargon could smother the stench of misogyny. And the legal profession is no better. A woman under siege is told to document everything while her stalker moves freely, slipping through legal loopholes like grease through fingers. The solution is not to plead more pre...
Read more