Truth About Narcissism, Highly Suspicious Behaviour

 

 ...Or, The Ego Trap: Why Pop Psychology is Fueling a Culture of Suspicion


Let’s get one thing straight sweetie—narcissism isn’t some dirty little secret lurking in the shadows of society. The way you perceive it probably, is just ego, and we all have it. Some more than others, sure, but without a healthy dose of self-regard, you’d never strut into that boardroom, work that red carpet, or have the confidence to chase what you desire. It’s survival.

Nastiness is nastiness not a pd!

But in this digital age of pound-shop psychology and self-proclaimed “experts,” suddenly everyone with a little swagger or self-assurance is a “narcissist.” Post one selfie too many? Narcissist. Prioritize your dreams? Narcissist. Set boundaries? Oh, you must be evil. The result? A culture of suspicion where every lover, boss, or friend is scrutinized, labeled, and discarded—no clinical degree required, just a Wi-Fi connection and a Facebook account.


Now, let’s be clear: narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is real. It’s a serious, complex psychiatric condition that goes far beyond just being selfish, arrogant, or confident. It’s marked by a deep, pathological need for admiration, an inability to truly empathize with others, and, at its worst, a manipulative, destructive nature that leaves real victims in its wake. It’s not a quirky personality flaw; it’s a disorder diagnosed by professionals who actually understand the difference between self-love and psychological dysfunction.


But the internet? It’s turned armchair diagnoses into a sport. Real NPD affects a small percentage of the population, but if you believed everything you saw online, you’d think half the world was full of raging narcissists. And that’s dangerous. It fosters paranoia, encourages people to cut ties with anyone who doesn’t meet their every emotional need, and turns personal conflicts into pathology. It’s not psychology—it’s a witch hunt in designer heels.


The truth? A little ego is power. It drives ambition, fuels creativity, and stops you from getting trampled by life’s users and abusers. So, let’s quit the reckless labeling and recognize the difference between confidence and pathology. Because if we keep slapping clinical terms on anyone who dares to shine, we’re not diagnosing a disorder—we’re dimming the lights on greatness.


Ai assisted

Liz Lucy Robillard



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witchhunt

From my upcoming memoir: 'My son suffers from severe autism or possibly Angelman syndrome (which wasn't definitively excluded when he underwent genetic testing). As a concerned parent, I reached out to several specialists in the field of autism, desperate to know how best to support him. In 1994, when my son was two, I started an information service called Autistic Information Matters to seek answers, provide support, and share facts. After much difficulty with professionals—including a Professor Ben Sacks who cruelly suggested I send my two-year-old to an institution (I told him to get out)—I discovered Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA). At the time, I believed it might be a miracle cure that could help my son begin speaking. However, after extensive research and insights from other parents, I came to realize that autism is an umbrella term, encompassing a variety of conditions rather than a single disorder. (I have written more about this elsewhere.) During this time, I wa...
Read more

Evidence Against Trans?

  chatgpt & liz lucy robillard, April 21st, 2025 It's natural to want to protect women from harm, especially from serious threats like rape. Some argue that to prevent even one assault, trans women (biological males) should be excluded from female-only spaces like toilets and prisons.  While this comes from a place of caution, it doesn’t hold up under evidence or ethical scrutiny. *Studies consistently show that inclusive policies do not increase assault rates in restrooms or changing rooms* Trans women using female spaces *does not* correlate with higher risks of violence against cisgender women according to studies.  The idea that cis men might pretend to be trans to access women’s areas is *extremely rare* and laws already exist to punish such behavior.  Are those laws effective enough? On the other hand, trans women face high rates of violence when forced into male-designated spaces, especially in prisons or public areas.  Denying them access often puts ...
Read more

Honouring Abused Women

  The idea that vulnerability disqualifies you from safety is perverse. It’s a cruel inversion of morality, peddled by the very professions sworn to protect. Social workers (not all, but enough to matter), lawyers, psychiatrists, police—these institutions too often treat a traumatised woman as a nuisance, a liability, or worse, a fantasist. If you flinch, you’re dramatic. If you weep, you’re unstable. If you speak up, you’re paranoid. This grotesque logic renders a woman’s suffering not only invisible, but suspect. They do not ask, What happened to her? They ask, What is wrong with her? It’s psychiatry’s favourite bait-and-switch. Diagnoses fly like confetti—borderline, histrionic, treatment-resistant—as though medical jargon could smother the stench of misogyny. And the legal profession is no better. A woman under siege is told to document everything while her stalker moves freely, slipping through legal loopholes like grease through fingers. The solution is not to plead more pre...
Read more