Social Workers, Too Trusting of Legals?

 Helping Social Workers Identify Psychopathic Traits in Legal Professionals


In the sensitive world of family law, vulnerable children and women depend on a fair, protective system. 


Yet sometimes, the very people entrusted with upholding justice — lawyers, guardians, even judges — may exhibit traits that actively harm rather than help.


Understanding how psychopathic behaviors can surface among legal professionals is crucial for social workers. Early identification can help protect families from further systemic abuse.




Why This Matters


Psychopathy is not just about criminal violence.

According to expert Dr. Robert Hare (author of Without Conscience, 1999), psychopathy is marked by superficial charm, manipulativeness, lack of empathy, deceitfulness, and a profound absence of guilt or remorse.


When these traits appear in legal professionals, it can dangerously skew outcomes:


Children's disclosures may be minimized or ignored.


Protective parents (often mothers) may be labeled as "alienators."


Court outcomes may favor abusers due to manipulation of the system.



Key Psychopathic Traits Social Workers Should Watch For


Superficial charm: A polished, charismatic manner that masks shallow intentions.


Manipulativeness: Twisting facts, gaslighting clients, bending narratives for self-interest.


Pathological lying: Lying comfortably in court documents or submissions without remorse.


Lack of empathy: Indifference toward child safety, victim trauma, or suffering.


Blame externalization: Always blaming victims or others, never accepting responsibility.


Grandiosity: Acting superior to ethical rules, displaying arrogance toward colleagues or the court.



Red Flags in Practice


Dismissing serious abuse evidence without credible reasons.


Vilifying protective parents as "hysterical" or "obsessive."


Aggressively threatening professionals who raise concerns.


Charm-offensive tactics targeting judges or senior staff while undermining others.



Practical Steps for Social Workers


Document everything: Keep clear, factual records of concerning behaviors.


Trust patterns, not excuses: Recognize repeated deception or cruelty.


Raise internal concerns: Follow safeguarding protocols if you suspect misconduct.


Seek peer support: Share experiences confidentially with trusted colleagues.


Push for trauma-informed training: Advocate for better understanding of coercive and manipulative behaviors in legal settings.




Recommended Reading and References


Hare, R. D. (1999). Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us. Guilford Press.


Stout, M. (2005). The Sociopath Next Door. Broadway Books.


Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work. Harper Business.


Hearn, J. (2020). Family Court Crisis: The Fight to Protect Children from Institutional Betrayal.


Ministry of Justice (2020). Assessing Risk of Harm to Children and Parents in Private Law Children Cases ("Harm Panel Report").


Judicial College (UK) resources on trauma-informed judicial practice.




---


Conclusion


Family courts are complex, emotionally charged spaces.

Social workers are frontline defenders of vulnerable families.

By learning to recognize psychopathic traits — and their subtle infiltration into the legal system — social workers can strengthen their role as protectors of truth, safety, and dignity.


Justice must not just be done — it must be seen to be done. 


Prompts by liz lucy robillard, chatgpt

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Witchhunt

From my upcoming memoir: 'My son suffers from severe autism or possibly Angelman syndrome (which wasn't definitively excluded when he underwent genetic testing). As a concerned parent, I reached out to several specialists in the field of autism, desperate to know how best to support him. In 1994, when my son was two, I started an information service called Autistic Information Matters to seek answers, provide support, and share facts. After much difficulty with professionals—including a Professor Ben Sacks who cruelly suggested I send my two-year-old to an institution (I told him to get out)—I discovered Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA). At the time, I believed it might be a miracle cure that could help my son begin speaking. However, after extensive research and insights from other parents, I came to realize that autism is an umbrella term, encompassing a variety of conditions rather than a single disorder. (I have written more about this elsewhere.) During this time, I wa...
Read more

Evidence Against Trans?

  chatgpt & liz lucy robillard, April 21st, 2025 It's natural to want to protect women from harm, especially from serious threats like rape. Some argue that to prevent even one assault, trans women (biological males) should be excluded from female-only spaces like toilets and prisons.  While this comes from a place of caution, it doesn’t hold up under evidence or ethical scrutiny. *Studies consistently show that inclusive policies do not increase assault rates in restrooms or changing rooms* Trans women using female spaces *does not* correlate with higher risks of violence against cisgender women according to studies.  The idea that cis men might pretend to be trans to access women’s areas is *extremely rare* and laws already exist to punish such behavior.  Are those laws effective enough? On the other hand, trans women face high rates of violence when forced into male-designated spaces, especially in prisons or public areas.  Denying them access often puts ...
Read more

Honouring Abused Women

  The idea that vulnerability disqualifies you from safety is perverse. It’s a cruel inversion of morality, peddled by the very professions sworn to protect. Social workers (not all, but enough to matter), lawyers, psychiatrists, police—these institutions too often treat a traumatised woman as a nuisance, a liability, or worse, a fantasist. If you flinch, you’re dramatic. If you weep, you’re unstable. If you speak up, you’re paranoid. This grotesque logic renders a woman’s suffering not only invisible, but suspect. They do not ask, What happened to her? They ask, What is wrong with her? It’s psychiatry’s favourite bait-and-switch. Diagnoses fly like confetti—borderline, histrionic, treatment-resistant—as though medical jargon could smother the stench of misogyny. And the legal profession is no better. A woman under siege is told to document everything while her stalker moves freely, slipping through legal loopholes like grease through fingers. The solution is not to plead more pre...
Read more