Lucy Letby Telegraph Today - Bacteria

 Today's Telegraph reported that there was dangerous, deadly bacteria at the Countess of Chester Hospital at the time Lucy Letby worked there. It made me question the likelihood of the bacterium being found by the coroner- as well as the obvious questions. I asked an ai to explain:


'Should the deadly bacteria in the Letby case have been found during post-mortems?


Yes. Under UK medical law and standard hospital practice, if a baby dies unexpectedly, a coroner’s post-mortem is usually required. These post-mortems include infection screening through blood cultures, tissue samples, and swabs from areas like the lungs or brain. If a dangerous bacterium (like Serratia or something similar) caused or contributed to the death, it should have been detected.


Who is responsible for identifying it?


The hospital’s pathology and microbiology team are responsible for running these tests and reporting results. If the case is under the coroner, they also review the findings. If multiple babies are affected, the hospital trust’s clinical governance team should be investigating as well. It could indicate a wider outbreak.


If the bacterium was missed, ignored, or not reported, that’s a serious procedural failure. It could also mean the true cause of death was recorded incorrectly. That would have a major impact on both the Letby case and any conclusions about hospital safety.


If this happened, why wasn’t it picked up sooner—and by whom? That’s something the inquiry needs to get to the bottom of.


The Telegraph article is here

 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/55c35e18f15fd0c7 


Liz Lucy Robillard





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Pedantry Fails The Justice System +

When Pedantry Misses Subtlety: Why Justice Demands a 360-Degree View By Liz Lucy Robillard & Ai In law, pedantry can be a curse. The obsession with procedural precision, semantics, or so-called “objective standards” often misses the humanity behind a case — its emotional, social, psychological, and moral dimensions. Nowhere is this more evident than in cases where rigid adherence to precedent or statutory wording has led to catastrophic injustice. This post explores how legal pedantry has failed people across jurisdictions, why true justice requires nuance, and how the mediation movement — led by experts like the UK's Paul Sandford — offers a more future-focused, humane path. I. When Legal Pedantry Fails: Case Studies 1. UK: R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 Issue: Joint enterprise doctrine punished people for crimes they did not commit directly. Result: Supreme Court overturned decades of flawed precedent. Why it matters: For years, courts rigidly applied faulty logic. Only later did th...
Read more

Lucy Letby Update- Thirwall and Reasonable Doubt

 The Notes and Reasonable Doubt UPDATE: 17/07/25 Thirwall Inquiry has been contacted to request verification as to whether or not the 'CRIME' model 2020 of profiling was used or not and to suggest correlations with Prof.Andy Bilsons recent publications 2025 of FII- for info on the model see (live linking on Blogger not functioning) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9103349/ Notes:  The notes and further reasons why there is reasonable doubt Lucy Letby’s Notes: Who Told Her to Write Them, What They Really Meant, and Why the Public Got It Wrong Lucy Letby wrote a series of disturbing and emotional notes during the police investigation into infant deaths at the Countess of Chester Hospital.  These notes have been repeatedly quoted in the media—especially the phrase “I am evil I did this”—but the full story behind them is often left out. Who told her to write the notes? Two professionals advised her to journal: • Kathryn de Beger, the hospital’s occupational health and...
Read more

Evidence Against Trans?

  chatgpt & liz lucy robillard, April 21st, 2025 It's natural to want to protect women from harm, especially from serious threats like rape. Some argue that to prevent even one assault, trans women (biological males) should be excluded from female-only spaces like toilets and prisons.  While this comes from a place of caution, it doesn’t hold up under evidence or ethical scrutiny. *Studies consistently show that inclusive policies do not increase assault rates in restrooms or changing rooms* Trans women using female spaces *does not* correlate with higher risks of violence against cisgender women according to studies.  The idea that cis men might pretend to be trans to access women’s areas is *extremely rare* and laws already exist to punish such behavior.  Are those laws effective enough? On the other hand, trans women face high rates of violence when forced into male-designated spaces, especially in prisons or public areas.  Denying them access often puts ...
Read more